Thursday, February 11, 2010

Obama Doesn’t Get It

I don’t know what happened to the man I elected to be president in 2008. That man is nowhere to be found…you know the one who was talking about “change” and how business as usual wasn’t going to cut in his White House.

 

Well, apparently, he is ok with JP Morgan/Chase’s CEO, Janie Dimon, and Goldman Sucks, excuse me, Sachs CEO Lloyd Blankfein’s  outrageous salaries and bonuses even though both of them basically ran their companies into the ground, and if they hadn’t been bailed out by the taxpayer last year, wouldn’t have made anything.  Obama does not begrudge them their success because “that’s what the free market is about.”

 

Free market, excuse me? I thought the free market was about allowing the weaker companies whose leadership made poor decisions fail while allowing smaller companies with smarter leaders take their place. I thought it was about competition.

 

I guess I was wrong. I guess competition and things like moral hazard only apply when you’re the middle class family who has fallen into poverty and is faced with foreclosure…because I hear all sorts of talk of moral hazard when it comes to the government helping a family like this save their home.

 

My disappointment in Obama can’t be described in words. We needed an FDR and we got a Herbert Hoover.

Wednesday, February 10, 2010

Apparently I Make Too Much Money

Yes, you read that right: OneWest denied my NACA mod request because they say my payment is already below 31% of my income. Huh???

All of my paperwork clearly shows my payment is in excess of 41% of my income, so my NACA negotiator is quite baffled by this response. Of course it is in line with the fact that OneWest has no interest in helping anyone.

I am now very worried that they will start the foreclosure process, which I have thus far evaded for more than a year now, by making at least one full payment a month, although never catching up on the three months I remain behind, but this month I have received no Breach letter which gives me the date by which I must make my next payment. Moreover, they’re not calling me constantly, haranguing me about payment.

I am very afraid that the process will be starting, and once that happens, options become extremely limited. If indeed they want to start foreclosure, even though I am making every effort to pay as a gesture of good will and to show how much I want to keep my house, I will be very upset.

Of course, my being upset will change nothing and won’t help me save my home. The only reason I am fighting so hard is because of my 80 year old mother who lives with us and whose home, really, at the end of the day, this is. My mother loves this house and has put in a lot of blood, sweat and tears into it. So have my husband and I. But for her, there is the additional dimension of the fact that her daughter died in this house ten years ago this February 19.

I can’t allow them to take this house. That has never been an option, but I am running out of places to turn.

I actually spoke to a lawyer who was willing to sue my servicer, but he wants $5000 to start. In my heart of hearts, I know that the courts are the only place I’ll see justice here, but where I am going to get $5000?

Well, enough of this sob story. Millions of other Americans are in my position and my heart goes out to them. I hope all of you find help soon.

Friday, January 8, 2010

Protest Takes Backseat To Water Heater Trouble

I really wanted to attend the protest, but my water heater decided that it just had to break the day before, and I had to forgo attending in order to deal with that troublesome appliance.

 

I did check  on the Internet and I checked on TV, but I did not see any media coverage of a large protest outside of IndyMac/OneWest’s  Pasadena office, so I don’t know what happened. I don’t know if anyone actually showed up. If it was only a few people, or if there wasn’t anyone there, then it would not have gotten any coverage, and that would be a shame.

 

I did receive a mass-mail out from IndyMac/OneWest inviting me to apply for a HAMP mod. This is a good thing, right? It shows IndyMac/OneWest is reaching out to its troubled borrowers, you might think.

 

Well, yes, except for the fact that when you read the list of documents that is required, there are two blatant lies right in the modification application. Two lies that would discourage certain people from applying and that make it exceedingly hard to meet the purported documentation requirements, almost impossible, you might say. The first is a requirement for self employed persons to submit an audited profit and loss statement or one signed by a CPA and the second is that if you’re using unemployment of disability income, that it must be expected to last for at least three years to be considered as income.

 

First of all, there is no requirement in HAMP for an audited profit and loss statement. Initially, this was unclear, but since then, the HAMP documentation makes it clear that while profit and loss statements are required of self employed persons, it is not required that they be audited. Such a requirement would make applying for a modification prohibitively expensive, and since people who need modifications are already in financial difficulty, it makes NO sense to require them to spend even more money that they don’t have. Lacking an audit or a compilation (where a CPA looks at your books and compiles your profit and loss statement based on your books,) no CPA will simply look at your profit and loss and sign it. There is no such thing, so IndyMac/OneWest is asking for an impossibility.

 

As for UI benefits, HAMP provisions are clear that if there are 9 or more months remaining of UI benefits,  UI counts as income. This is a recent provision, and a good one, since jobs are scarce and more and more people are out of work.

 

The application is full of lies…no, not misinformation, not mistaken information, but outright lies, for IndyMac/OneWest has no interest in modifying anyone’s loans. They make too much off of foreclosures thanks to the sweetheart deal the FDIC made with them. Thanks, FDIC!

 

Think I am making this up? Out of 1711 trial modifications, there have been ZERO permanent ones offered by IndyMac/OneWest.  While they might talk a good game and pretend to “be there to help,” nothing can be further from the truth.

Friday, January 1, 2010

How Do You Sleep At Night?

This post is aimed at George Soros, Michael Dell, and Steve Mnuchin, the owners/primary investors of IndyMac/OneWest.


The deal you struck with the government renders any effort by me or others like me to get a loan modification in order to save our homes useless. Why? Because your loss-sharing agreement with the FDIC will certainly always make it more profitable to foreclose rather than to modify.


Instead of being honest about your intentions, you hide them by signing on to the HAMP program, and with NACA. You drag homeowners like me along for a year, extracting inflated payments that I can’t afford, and for which I sacrifice or at least juggle other necessities to pay. Your customer service representatives have the nerve to try and charge me $20 for the privilege of making said inflated payment to boot.


Why don’t you just be honest about your intentions? Yes, you’ll take public flak, but you’re already extremely unpopular anyway. Don’t think we love you or are praising you simply because we’re still in our homes…we know our days are numbered and eventually we’ll be forced out.


By being honest, you can at least let us make the proper decisions to see to our best benefit, just as you are seeing to yours. Maybe our best benefit is to stop paying you a single penny and save every time to secure a new place to live. What is not in our best interests is to be kept on the loan modification merry-go-round forever, all while you suck us dry…which I guess is the point.

Wednesday, December 30, 2009

IndyMac Is Evil

Over the past year, I have had to field numerous collection calls from IndyMac on my cell phone. I purposely gave my cell phone number to avoid calls on my home telephone number because my elderly mother lives with us and she doesn't need to hear the harassing phone calls ten times a day.

Well, just recently, IndyMac started calling my home number and completely out of the blue. Like I am going to find all of money that I owe them because they somehow found another number to call. I specifically told them under NO circumstances to call my home number and to remove it from the contact list. I was told my home number was removed.

Tonight, IndyMac rang my home number again. I went off on the representative. I told her in no uncertain terms to remove my home number and only contact me on my cell number. I told her a few other things, too. I did not hurl obscenities at her, but I did tell her that IndyMac is a criminal bank.

I am so sick of IndyMac/OneWest. I am sick of the calls and sick of them bleeding me dry while I am on the modification merry-go-round. I am sick of their tactics and I've had enough.

I am looking forward to Monday, January 4th when I can stand in protest outside of IndyMac/OneWest's offices. I hope there are thousands of other homeowners like me who attend and I hope it gets on the news. They need to be stopped. The evil needs to end.

Monday, December 21, 2009

January 4th 2010: National Shame On IndyMac/OneWest Bank Day

It is clear that IndyMac/OneWest has no intentions of granting anyone a permanent modification. It is clear that IndyMac/OneWest will make more money EVERY time it forecloses, thanks to a sweetheart deal with the FDIC. It is clear that our government is owned by the banks and is unresponsive to the will of the people.

We don't have to sit here and take this crap any longer. We need to stand up and demand that our voices be heard, and the first step to doing that is to attend the protest outside of IndyMac/OneWest's offices in Pasadena, CA. on January 4th 2010. More info on the protest here.

But protesting outside of IndyMac/OneWest is not enough. We need to let our government know that we don't approve of the way they've handled the foreclosure crisis and that we don't approve of all of the breaks the banks are getting while homeowners are getting thrown out of their homes.

In order to do that, I propose a massive homeowner protest all across America. On the day of the protest, every distressed homeowner needs to protest outside of their local government offices. If you live in the capital of your state, protest outside the state capital buildings. If you live in Washington, protest outside of the halls of Congress.

Under the face of such a massive public outcry, our government will have to respond. The Wall Street fat cats who were the architects of the current disaster are counting on the American people to be apathetic, to care more about who Tiger Woods is sleeping with than the provisions that are being sneaked into legislation passing through Congress. Prove them wrong. Raise your voices and be heard.

Friday, December 18, 2009

The Motley Fool is more Foolish Than Ever

Ok, these arch conservative investor types need to go to hell, seriously. Even in my cold addled state, I still bristle when I think about this article.

The article states that it is a mistake to hold the bankers accountable for not doing enough modifications. Leave the banks alone, the author rails! Let them do what they do best and get tear off the scabs that are delinquent mortgage holders by foreclosing on them quickly! Read the article, I've accurately summed up this idiot's words.

First of all, let's start with "leave the banks alone" for a minute. Isn't "leaving the banks alone" what got us into this mess in the first place? Isn't the deregulation that allowed mortgages to be "securitized" and traded on the stock market the main factor in the financial pickle that we're all in? So, yeah...let's continue to leave the banks alone...that's worked out so WELL!

Secondly, let's look at what would happen if foreclosures were allowed to proceed unchecked. Housing values would continue to dive as more and more foreclosures flood the market, and with unemployment continuing to soar, there are very few buyers out there. So, homes would stand vacant and untended. Neighborhoods would deteriorate and the number of homeless would rise sharply. All of this would drive the economy into a deeper depression, which, newsflash! is good for no one, not even fat cat investor types like the author.

The author is big on letting the markets correct themselves, only this problem was not caused by free market forces. This problem was caused by governmental policies that institutionalized greed and facilitated the biggest re-distribution of wealth from the bottom to the top in United States history.

In closing, there needs to be a major economic re-balancing, and those firms that took risks that they never should have taken need to be allowed to fail. Their victims, the homeowners of America, need to have their mortgages reworked to make them sane and affordable, regardless of how they came to be, and regardless of income.